Profitable thrift store using ‘smoke screen’ to appear charitable, critics say

• Savers recently opened its 19th Australian location in Geelong, drawing large crowds and highlighting the brand’s significant expansion within the regional second-hand retail market.
• Despite its local presence, the retailer is a subsidiary of Savers Value Village, a multi-billion dollar US-based for-profit company majority-owned by a private equity firm.
• The company’s for-profit model has generated controversy among traditional charity-led retailers, who argue that its commercial scale and donation bins create unfair competition for non-profit organizations.

The energy in Geelong was electric as crowds gathered for the grand opening of the latest Savers store. On August 27, eager shoppers formed a 100-meter queue outside the retailer’s signature “big red box,” with some having traveled hours to be there. At the very front of the line, a heavily pregnant woman shared her excitement with a laugh, noting that with two babies on the way, she was on a mission to stock up on clothes.

While this regional Victorian site marks the company’s 19th location in Australia, many shoppers may not realize that Savers Australia is a subsidiary of a massive global powerhouse. Its parent company, Savers Value Village (SVV), is a $2.2 billion juggernaut traded on the New York Stock Exchange and majority-owned by the American private equity firm Ares Management.

Dominating the North American market, SVV stands as the continent’s largest for-profit second-hand retailer, boasting 185 stores in the United States and 172 in Canada. The company’s financial health is equally impressive; according to Refinitiv data, it maintained a gross profit margin of 50 per cent last year—well above the industry average—and pulled in earnings exceeding $300 million.

This financial muscle gives Savers a distinct advantage in the Australian market. Analytics firm IBISWorld recently noted that large-scale retailers like Savers and Cash Converters consistently outperform smaller, independent shops. This success is primarily driven by their ability to harness significant economies of scale, allowing them to process and sell goods with an efficiency that smaller competitors simply cannot match.

However, Savers’ for-profit business model makes it a controversial outlier in the Australian landscape. Unlike its primary competitors, such as Vinnies and the Salvos, which are non-profit organizations that use sales to fund community programs, Savers operates to generate returns for its private equity owners. This has created friction with traditional charity op shops that rely on public donations to survive.

Critics within the charitable sector have expressed concern over Savers’ expansion, arguing that its use of charity donation bins creates a “veneer” or “smoke screen” of altruism that may mislead donors. Esther Koning-Oakes, a leader in the local charity space, emphasized the importance of community-focused commerce, suggesting that the benefits of second-hand trade should stay within Australia to support local social initiatives rather than being funneled to international investors.

... read the full article here